![]() ![]() |
| Clean Feral |
Mar 2 2012, 06:29 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 12-February 12 Member No.: 15,267 |
Are the funds raised from Pet registrations and microchipping wasted?
duty of care is rubbish when pets that have passed away are buried in land fill unreported. We've been lead this way into a warped grim reality. Their storys unknown. Are they lost? Are people doing the right thing? Is this a joke? For decades, centuries, the unoticed pets are inocent victims. Facilities are available that would allow automatic scanning of all material processed for landfill and recyling. Let's make use of the failed microchip implants and scan for them? Rubbish from bins is bought and considered their property, they have no control over what the material it contains when they receive it. They try process it with some form of quality to their own standards and sell it. http://www.facebook.com/BanWastedPetRegoFundsPetition Here's a petition for the councils and companies involved to introduce automatic and manual scanners for RIP pets and stop wasting pet registration funding |
| kittenmitten |
Mar 3 2012, 12:56 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Super Member Group: Members Posts: 419 Joined: 22-June 09 Member No.: 13,723 |
and since you posted exactly the same post word for word on another forum, but have not yet responded to any of the queries, will make the same reply here - exactly what are you talking about - are you talking about animals that may sadly have passed, but the owner cannot afford to have them cremated, and so has arranged for he vet to dispose of them, are you talking about feral / stray animals that council has collected and PTS, are you saying these animals were actually chipped but microchip registered have not been updated, or what? Don;t know what you are talking about - as far as council rego goes, that is part of the animal education program, and I certainly don';t want my money just used scanning bodies at the tip, sorry. Don;t see a purpose to it.
|
| Clean Feral |
Mar 4 2012, 07:16 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 12-February 12 Member No.: 15,267 |
Thanks for your response. If an old person or vet has done what you've described then the scanners could tell.
I'm researching Sustainable Growth and have questions about the way information from waste and resource managment could promote health by enabling people to perform meaningful and purposeful activities. I'll explain more when I know more |
| love.my.cats |
Mar 5 2012, 06:18 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 111 Joined: 23-January 12 Member No.: 15,215 |
I'm extremely confused. I'm not sure what you mean by the first post at all. I'm also very confused about this comment: If an old person or vet has done what you've described then the scanners could tell. What do you mean by that? What are you wanting microchip scanners to 'tell us'? -------------------- |
| kittenmitten |
Mar 5 2012, 08:55 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Super Member Group: Members Posts: 419 Joined: 22-June 09 Member No.: 13,723 |
no idea what you are on about either
|
| Clean Feral |
Mar 5 2012, 07:44 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 12-February 12 Member No.: 15,267 |
Confusing? Sorry.
Most landfill comes from household waste, recyclables & greens. The bins people put out each week with the name of their council written on it. They call this Curbside Collection Animals aren't meant to be in these bins. You know why it's wrong. That's why. A pet microchip scanner would be for an animals welfare before being buried in landfill because the animals would be identified, their data would be recovered and someone qualified would be notified. Not notifying anyone is wrong. It's worse than lying about it, "the animal wasn't able to be identified" "it's not a live bait trap" One day household waste trucks will have scanners that would alert the driver if an animal was in the material being picked up. QUOTE Animals aren't meant to be in these bins. I'm not qualified to explain why it's wrong. Why bother explaining someone like Mary Bale that could do such a thing. She's old fat and ugly. |
| kittenmitten |
Mar 6 2012, 01:35 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Super Member Group: Members Posts: 419 Joined: 22-June 09 Member No.: 13,723 |
so you think the only thing in landfill is only household waste - where do you imagine vets and pounds put their waste, and do you imagine they cremate all the animals they have to PTS - not everyone is able to bury them in their backyard, nor are those that may be dead by the side of the road or PTS by pounds etc. Sorry, but still not sure what you are driving at - are you really suggesting dead animals should have the chips removed to be reused, or that someone should scan each bit of rubbish coming in, see if there are any dead animals in it, access chip records to see if the owner can be found, and then track them down and ask them why is there dead animal going into landfill? Exactly what is that meant to achieve?
|
| Clean Feral |
Mar 6 2012, 06:30 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 12-February 12 Member No.: 15,267 |
Clinical waste is buried in a different part of land fill. If a recorded live animal was found it's status could be automatically updated.
If an animal was found to be buried with household waste in landfill, where it wasn't meant to be, not only are the health and safety of garbage collection workers put at risk, but the person responsible for performing the act is also at risk. Like i said there's no control over what goes in bins, but if infomation is found that could "promote health by enabling people to perform meaningful and purposeful activities", this is something and not wasted. |
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 11:28 PM |